Stop manual preparation errors. Register for our webinar series to see how robotic automation ensures GC/MS results are a pure reflection of your science.
Story
Metabolomics, GC/MS
5 min 05.18.2026

Webinar Series: Modernizing GC/MS Workflows

Analytical precision is often compromised long before the sample reaches the detector. While instrumental sensitivity has reached historic heights, technical noise introduced during sampling, liquid handling, and inadequate storage remains the primary bottleneck for reproducible research. Every scientist knows the frustration of a perfectly calibrated instrument producing a noisy dataset due to variables outside the detector’s reach. This June, join PAL System, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and RECETOX to explore the transition from manual batch processing to automated robotic reliability.

Introduction

In high-throughput GC/MS analysis, a critical yet frequently overlooked source of technical variation is the inconsistent "waiting time" between sample preparation and injection. When samples are processed in manual batches, the interval between the completion of a reaction and the moment of injection varies across the set. This inconsistency forces analytes to undergo varying degrees of degradation or incomplete reaction. Research by Miyagawa and Bamba (2019) established that this batch-to-batch temporal drift leads to repeatability issues, confirming that sequential processing—maintaining a constant, "just-in-time" interval for every single sample—is the optimal way to ensure truly reliable results.

This principle of temporal control is a universal requirement that bridges across disparate fields. Whether you are working with clinical derivatizations or environmental water analysis, the stability of the analyte is at the mercy of the clock. In VOC analysis, automation provides precise liquid handling for the preparation of calibration standards and QCs, ensuring that volatiles do not escape during the wait. Similarly, in SVOC workflows, robotic reliability replaces laborious manual liquid-liquid extraction with automated micro-LLE. This ensures constant phase-separation times and consistent extraction intensity, variables that are nearly impossible to standardize manually across a long sequence.

Modernizing your daily GC/MS workflows with robotic reliability addresses these variables at the source. By automating the entire chain—from precise QCs and liquid handling to sequential sample preparation as well as the injection—the technical noise is silenced. The outcome is a workflow where results are a reflection of your science and the sample's true composition, rather than a byproduct of timing inconsistencies and manual handling.

 

Register for the Webinar Series

Can't make it to the live session? Register anyway. We will send the full recording and the technical application notes directly to your inbox following the event.

Gegner Hagen
Hagen Gegner

Scientific Communications Specialist

Visit Bio

Stop manual preparation errors. Register for our webinar series to see how robotic automation ensures GC/MS results are a pure reflection of your science.

Session 1: Reliable VOC Preparation and Temporal Control

Date: Monday, June 15, 2026 Time: 16:30 CEST (UTC+2)

Headspace analysis is the backbone of GC. This session focuses on modernizing the VOC workflow for water analysis by implementing robotic precision. We demonstrate how sequential liquid handling and automated injection phases move your lab from manual uncertainty to a system that delivers consistent, reproducible data through identical sample-to-sample timing. 

Join Dr. Daniela Cavagnino from Thermo Fisher Scientific and Dr. Hagen Gegner in this application-focused deep dive.

 

Who should attend

Environmental scientists, GC/MS experts and lab managers looking to eliminate operator-induced variation in high-volume VOC testing.

 

Stop manual preparation errors. Register for our webinar series to see how robotic automation ensures GC/MS results are a pure reflection of your science.

Session 2: Sequential Derivatization for Clinical Consistency

Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 Time: 16:30 CEST (UTC+2)

In clinical metabolomics, derivative stability and manual sample preparation are major drivers of technical noise and experimental bias. Guest speaker Dr. Akrem Jbebli (RECETOX) joins us to demonstrate how modernizing blood analysis workflows with automated, sequential derivatization can overcome these challenges and deliver robust GC-Orbitrap metabolomics data. We will examine the standardization of automated, two-step in-vial derivatization protocols that bring strictly controlled conditions to routine sample-to-sample workflows for dried blood spots (DBS), serum, and plasma. Akrem will share detailed methods, QA/QC practices, and reproducibility datasets, showcasing how documenting and replicating every step of sample preparation ensures reliable biological insights. All resources and datasets from this study will be shared to support future field development.

 

Who should attend

Clinical researchers, mass spectrometry specialists, and metabolomics experts who need to scale blood-based studies without the risk of temporal degradation or manual processing bias invalidating their results.

 

Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) is a significant source of pre-analytical noise due to inconsistent manual handling.

Session 3: Sustainable SVOC Analysis and Automated Extraction

Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2026 Time: 16:30 CEST (UTC+2)

Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) is a significant source of pre-analytical noise due to inconsistent manual handling. We showcase how to modernize this workflow by replacing manual extraction with robotic micro-LLE. By automating the extraction process sequentially, we significantly reduce technical variation and solvent consumption while maintaining full EPA 8270 compliance.

Join Dr. Daniela Cavagnino from Thermo Fisher Scientific and Dr. Hagen Gegner in this EPA-compliant deep dive.

Who should attend

Analytical chemists and sustainability officers aiming to reduce their solvent footprint and eliminate the physical variables of manual extractions

 

Enable This Content

Content required confirmation

Accept
Show More

Related Content

Contact LinkedIn